Criminalize Words in the I Have a Dream Speech by Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Words are just words.” These words are often said to minimize the impact words can have on individuals. Were the words of Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, simply words? Wars have actually been begun by the simple utterance of words. Justice in the law court have actually been served by words. Words can leave an enduring mark on an individual in a positive or unfavorable manner. Words that effect somebody negatively can cause fantastic damage to a person, but we do not criminalize words. This conversation highlights the importance of totally free speech and mentions the disparities in our justice system.

When you read an inspiring quote or listen to an impressive speech, it can seem like it is touching our souls. Most people would confess to experiencing this, but will likewise agree that “words are simply words.” Offending and insulting speech can be harmful to the health and wellbeing of an individual. Bullying frequently comes in the kind of verbal abuse and there have actually been cases of serious bullying that has ended in bullying victims take their own lives. Still, we lessen the value of words because they are simply sounds that come out of our mouths. If you take a bike or if you were to push someone to the ground, it would be a criminal act. Ultimately, these acts have little result on the wellness of the victim long-lasting. Not to excuse these acts, but in comparison to severe spoken bullying that can cause anxiety and suicide, these criminal acts pale in contrast.

Some might suggest that we criminalize words the method we do petty crime. Free speech, no matter how damaging, is important to a democracy and the ban of specific words need to not be searched for. What can be criminalized is the systematic act of bullying. The act of consistently harassing someone by numerous ways of interaction, whether it be face-to-face or on the internet. In Massachusetts, a teenage lady that sent her boyfriend text messages that encouraged him to dedicate suicide. The partner wound up killing himself and the Supreme Judicial Court later ruled that the grand jury’s indictment was legal. The grand jury had ruled to prosecute her on uncontrolled manslaughter charges based upon the text transcripts.

It seems the justice system is mostly based upon physical criminal activities. As long as their is no physical attack or theft included, it goes outside the world of justice. Words on the other hand are just safe acoustic wave that do not hint the violence that physical criminal activities do. Free speech is such a critical part of American democracy that it would be extremely controversial to criminalize words. The simpler step to take is to legalize victimless crimes, especially those that pertain to drugs. Words can lead to serious damage to an individual’s psyche and will go largely undetected and unpunished, however thousands will go to prison for petty and victimless crimes. With approximately 50 new criminal laws created each year, there is no end in sight for incongruent penalties for victimless crimes.

It is hard to make the case that words do not matter when there is proof all around us suggesting otherwise. Mental suffering is simply as hazardous and oftentimes more severe than smaller sized criminal offenses that do bring severe jail sentences. In lieu of getting rid of free speech, efforts need to be made to determine and criminalize specific cases of systematic abuse, such as the abovementioned case in Massachusetts and likewise decriminalize or decrease the penalty for petty and victimless criminal activities. It is tough and controversial to manage speech, however what ought to not be questionable is to separate relatively benign speech with those that can encourage someone to end their life.