One of the play’s most consistent visual motifs is the contrast in between light and dark, frequently in terms of night/day images. Need Evidence! This contrast is not given a particular metaphoric significance– light is not always great, and dark is not constantly evil. On the contrary, light and dark are generally used to offer a sensory contrast and to mean opposed options.
One of the more crucial instances of this motif is Romeo’s lengthy meditation on the sun and the moon during the veranda scene, in which Juliet, metaphorically referred to as the sun, is seen as eliminating the “jealous moon” and transforming the night into day (2. 46). A comparable blurring of night and day occurs in the morning hours after the lovers’ only night together.
Romeo, required to leave for exile in the morning, and Juliet, not wanting him to leave her room, both attempt to pretend that it is still night, and that the light is really darkness: “More light and light, more dark and dark our issues” (3. 5. 36) The Inevitability of Fate In its first address to the audience, the Chorus states that Romeo and Juliet are “star-crossed”– that is to state that fate (a power typically vested in the motions of the stars) controls them (Prologue. ). This sense of fate permeates the play, and not just for the audience. The characters likewise are quite familiar with it: Romeo and Juliet constantly see prophecies. When Romeo thinks that Juliet is dead, he weeps out, “Then I defy you, stars,” completing the idea that the love in between Romeo and Juliet is in opposition to the decrees of destiny (5. 1. 24). Naturally, Romeo’s defiance itself plays into the hands of fate, and his determination to invest eternity with Juliet results in their deaths.
The mechanism of fate operates in all of the events surrounding the fans: the feud in between their households (it deserves noting that this hatred is never discussed; rather, the reader must accept it as an indisputable aspect of the world of the play); the horrible series of mishaps that ruin Friar Lawrence’s seemingly well-intentioned plans at the end of the play; and the terrible timing of Romeo’s suicide and Juliet’s awakening. These occasions are not simple coincidences, but rather manifestations of fate that assist bring about the unavoidable result of the young fans’ deaths.
The concept of fate explained above is the most typically accepted analysis. There are other possible readings of fate in the play: as a force determined by the effective social organizations that affect Romeo and Juliet’s options, in addition to fate as a force that emerges from Romeo and Juliet’s very personalities. Connect this to Friar Lawernce! STRUCTURE -briefly respond to the question awhat the relationship resembles, what sort of impression you get of the relationship. 2nd paragraph)-Context- discuss how men/women were supposed to act when the plays were composed a how is this reflected in the text? (this bit is necessary for Band 4/5). How do you think an audience might have responded to the relationship when the play was first performed? How might a modern audienceas reaction be various? (Third paragraph)- How language reveals the relationship- choose 3 or 4 key examples of words that expose to you the relationship a may be a simile/ metaphor that has been used or a striking phrase/word.
Attempt to select them from the various scenes you are focusing on. For each make sure you analyse how the word/phrase suggests concepts about the relationship, not just what it recommends. (4th paragraph)- How structure reveals the relationship- think in specific about the relationship changes as the play advances- examine how Shakespeare shows the relationship changing as the play goes on. (5th paragraph)- How significant techniques expose the relationship- this might consist of: the setting; actions; phase directions.
Try to find one or two examples Shakespeare presents Romeo & & Juliet’s early relationship as a love-hate affair. By this I indicate that although they enjoy each other tremendously, they are surrounded by the hate of their 2 households Set up marriages were very common at the time depending on your social status and love had no meaning. At the time marrying at the age of 12 appeared to be regular, however now is frowned at.