Among the play’s most constant visual concepts is the contrast between light and dark, often in regards to night/day images. Required Proof! This contrast is not offered a particular metaphoric significance– light is not always good, and dark is not constantly wicked. On the contrary, light and dark are typically utilized to supply a sensory contrast and to mean opposed options.
Among the more crucial instances of this motif is Romeo’s prolonged meditation on the sun and the moon during the balcony scene, in which Juliet, metaphorically referred to as the sun, is viewed as getting rid of the “envious moon” and transforming the night into day (2. 46). A similar blurring of night and day takes place in the morning hours after the fans’ only night together.
Romeo, required to leave for exile in the early morning, and Juliet, not wanting him to leave her room, both attempt to pretend that it is still night, which the light is really darkness: “More light and light, more dark and dark our woes” (3. 5. 36) The Inevitability of Fate In its first address to the audience, the Chorus states that Romeo and Juliet are “star-crossed”– that is to say that fate (a power typically vested in the movements of the stars) controls them (Prologue. ). This sense of fate permeates the play, and not simply for the audience. The characters likewise are quite aware of it: Romeo and Juliet continuously see omens. When Romeo thinks that Juliet is dead, he cries out, “Then I defy you, stars,” finishing the concept that the love in between Romeo and Juliet remains in opposition to the decrees of destiny (5. 1. 24). Naturally, Romeo’s defiance itself plays into the hands of fate, and his decision to spend eternity with Juliet results in their deaths.
The system of fate works in all of the events surrounding the lovers: the feud in between their families (it deserves noting that this hatred is never described; rather, the reader should accept it as an undeniable aspect of the world of the play); the dreadful series of mishaps that destroy Friar Lawrence’s seemingly well-intentioned strategies at the end of the play; and the awful timing of Romeo’s suicide and Juliet’s awakening. These events are not mere coincidences, however rather manifestations of fate that help cause the inevitable result of the young fans’ deaths.
The principle of fate described above is the most commonly accepted interpretation. There are other possible readings of fate in the play: as a force identified by the effective social organizations that influence Romeo and Juliet’s options, along with fate as a force that emerges from Romeo and Juliet’s very personalities. Link this to Friar Lawernce! STRUCTURE -briefly address the question awhat the relationship resembles, what sort of impression you get of the relationship. 2nd paragraph)-Context- discuss how men/women were supposed to act when the plays were composed a how is this reflected in the text? (this bit is essential for Band 4/5). How do you believe an audience might have responded to the relationship when the play was very first performed? How might a contemporary audienceas reaction be different? (Third paragraph)- How language exposes the relationship- select 3 or 4 key examples of words that expose to you the relationship a might be a simile/ metaphor that has been used or a striking phrase/word.
Attempt to select them from the different scenes you are focusing on. For each make certain you analyse how the word/phrase suggests ideas about the relationship, not simply what it suggests. (4th paragraph)- How structure exposes the relationship- believe in particular about the relationship changes as the play progresses- examine how Shakespeare reveals the relationship altering as the play goes on. (5th paragraph)- How dramatic techniques expose the relationship- this might consist of: the setting; actions; phase directions.
Try to find a couple of examples Shakespeare presents Romeo & & Juliet’s early relationship as a love-hate affair. By this I imply that although they love each other immensely, they are surrounded by the hate of their 2 households Set up marital relationships were very common at the time depending upon your social status and love had no meaning. At the time weding at the age of 12 seemed normal, nevertheless now is opposed.