Miss Emily Grierson: Her Strength and Weakness as Portrayed in “A Rose for Emily”

In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily,” Miss Emily Grierson has actually been perceived by her townsfolk as an icon and a monolith, and that her household “held themselves a little too expensive for what they truly were. None of the boys were rather good enough for Miss Emily and such.

We had long thought of them as a tableau […] (Faulkner ).

But deep down, Miss Emily was a damaged lady, protecting herself from the modifications of the world by quelching the changes and rather living in a make-believe world where she still was considered a female of self-respect.

Among the meanings used by Faulker to exemplify Miss Emily’s resistance to change is Miss Emily’s home which” […] had as soon as been [in] our most choose street […] Miss Emily’s house was left, lifting its persistent and coquettish decay above the cotton wagons and the fuel pumps” (Faulkner ).

This exemplifies Miss Emily’s personality who has actually strived to prevent the modifications brought about by time within the town that she lived in (Holland 295-96).

Emily’s resistance to change is likewise depicted in her actions after the demise of her dad where she declined to have him buried and “informed them that her dad was not dead. She did that for 3 days, with the ministers calling on her, and the doctors, trying to encourage her to let them deal with the body” (Faulkner; Holland 297) along with when she was visited by the present mayor of the town in order to advise her about the taxes Miss Emily requires to pay, she sternly informed them that according to “Colonel Sartoris […] I have no taxes in Jefferson” (Faulkner) and recommended that they ought to consult with him concerning the matter.

This left the mayor and his companions baffled because not only existed no record in their books about such arrangement, but also the fact that Colonel Sartoris has actually been deceased for around ten years.

When the townsfolk started to see Miss Emily with Homer Barron, this shocked the town because “a Grierson would not believe seriously of a Northerner, a day worker” (Faulkner ).

They had attributed this to the reality that considering that in the past,” […] her dad had actually driven away […] (Faulkner) all the young men who had tried to court Miss Emily during her more youthful years. However, “since Homer himself had remarked-he liked guys and […] that he was not a marrying guy” (Faulkner ), Miss Emily took matters into her own hands in order to avoid the modification in their relationship from taking place.

Miss Emily’s behavior was associated by the townsfolk as something that run in the household and a result of their happy nature by describing “how old woman Wyatt, her great-aunt, had actually gone totally crazy at last […] even with madness in the family she would not have actually denied all of her chances if they had truly materialized” (Faulkner ).

Taking a more detailed take a look at the story, Faulkner had offered the reader some hints that drove Miss Emily into behaving in a manner that the townsfolk regarded as bizarre.

Sigmund Freud had developed the principle of repression on the concept of self-deceit and forgetting things at will at the very same time forgetting that such an act has actually even taken place (Billig 13). One factor for repression to take place is because of the feelings of distress felt by a person. Distress might be attributed from unfavorable changes from one scenario to another. This consists of changes in time household, economic security that emotional well-being of a specific (Mirowsky and Ross 112).

Moms and dads also contribute to the repression as seen in Freud’s Oedipus complex where the child gets routines from their parents. Since what the adult says is more crucial than what the kid states and the moms and dads would enforce things on the kid, the tendency of the kid is to quelch his or her desires (Billig 105). All of these are clearly seen in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily.”

Miss Emily’s repression was rooted on the upbringing she had actually received from her dad. Her father indirectly imposed that he would be the only crucial individual in the life of Miss Emily and quelched her longing to have relationships with other individuals in her town, particularly with the men. Miss Emily ultimately carried this upbringing all throughout her life as “if that quality of her daddy which had thwarted her female’s life so many times had been too virulent and too furious to die” (Faulkner ).