Of Mice and Men Compared to La Strada

Of Mice and Guy Compared to La Strada

Of Mice And Male and La Strada Relative Essay Snead 3Y There are lots of books that share similar ideas, such as similar archetypal importance, journeys, or perhaps the exact same kinds of characters. One great example of this is Steinbeck’s Of Mice And Male and Fellini’s La Strada. When compared they have seem to have a lot in common, from their similar character types to the over all journeys that happen in both of these fantastic stories. In Fellini’s La Strada the main character, Gelsomina, is very innocent and kid like.

This is revealed by frequently revealing her by the lively sea in addition to being followed by animals and kids throughout the movie. Then there is Zampano, a rather dull muscle man who doesn’t believe much before he acts. Yet, Gelsomina follows him with unwavering dedication throughout the film. Just as soon as does she appear to question her location with him and quickly after us seeing her doubt her place the Fool, an innocent lively guy, puts her back in the mindset that is her function. After all whatever has a purpose, even a pebble. The Fool, or Il Mato, is always tinkering Zampano and is constantly outsmarting him.

Right from the very first time we see these 2 characters it is clear that Zampano despises the fool and eventually chases after him with a knife. The knife represents Zampano’s physical method to things and how he is viewed in regards to masculinity. The Fool continues tinkering Zampano, up until Zampano unintentionally eliminates him. His instant idea it that his profession is over and this shows simply how physical he is and how he sees everything as “what can it provide for me? “. He bought Gelsomina from her family, definitely not for her benefit however for his own.

This behavior also shows in the method he deals with Rosa, he sees women as things that exist to benefit him. He didn’t recognize his own strength and later states in the motion picture “It was just two punches, two punches! “. Here he’s clearly trying to validate the wrong he unwittingly devoted. This isn’t the only wrong. Towards the end of the film Zampano leaves Gelsomina with some money and her trumpet and years later discovers that she passed away because he left her there. I think that him leaving her was foreshadowing her death due to the fact that there is no chance she would understand what to do, she didn’t know how to survive without him.

In Steinbeck’s Of Mice And Guy, the main characters are the innocent arrested Lenny and his pal George, both of whom are very strong workingmen who circumnavigate looking for physical labor that can be done. Lenny is psychologically retarded and follows George like a puppy. George is typically around animals, from the little mouse he was carrying in his pocket to the puppy he liked so much. In the beginning of the book George utilized to mess with Lenny because of his undeviating dedication once he understood how real it was he stopped it immediately.

George is referred to as a reasonably strong guy who is very smart and does the thinking for both him and Lenny. He watches out for Lenny and feels responsible for him. Lenny feels that his place is always right next to George. Nevertheless in the end of this book George abuses Lenny’s trust and murders him with the weapon utilized to eliminate Sweet’s pet around the time they got here. He even killed him the exact same method that they eliminated the canine, one shot, right to the back of the head. I believe Steinbeck having the dog eliminated, foreshadows the death of Lenny.

Not just that he will pass away, but that somebody who loves him will be the one to eliminate him. I believe it reveals that Lenny will pass away because he is constantly around animals, you’re expected to associate him with animals and animals, and that this dog isn’t like most other pet dogs similar to Lenny isn’t like most other individuals. They both have things working versus them. For Lenny it’s being psychologically retarded and for the dog it is the way that age has affected him. Both of these stories have a lot in common as far as stereotypical meaning goes. They both have the child-like, innocent character represented by Gelsomina and Lenny.

By having these characters in these pieces the audience is provided someone to appreciate and feel connected to. These two both act and are treated very much like children which makes it simple for us to see them in an innocent, favorable light giving us someone to be interested in, we want to ensure they are all right and that absolutely nothing bad takes place to them. There are many ways you can inform how innocent these characters are, both are shown with small animals a lot and Gelsomina is likewise displayed in the same shot as the ocean a lot. These stories also have the physical male characters that very much impact the lives of the innocent characters.

These physical characters would be George and Zampano, while these 2 characters themselves have extremely little in common as far as the time they lived and their occupation their personal tales draw an unexpected quantity of parallels. These 2 are both protectors of the innocent characters, provided the task to supervise them and are responsible for Lenny and Gelsomina. Both George and Zampano wind up eliminating their innocent buddy in the end. The deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina are both heavily foreshadowed. Zampano is extremely obvious with the reality that he does not care what takes place to Gelsomina and like needing to look after her.

So when he leaves her by the side of the roadway it’s tough to be amazed due to the fact that this was something you might see him doing to Gelsomina because he constantly treated her like a concern. Nevertheless when George winds up eliminating Lenny it comes as a big shock to the reader because he had actually always enjoyed and protected him. Although he didn’t want to eliminate Lenny it was for the safety of individuals that Lenny interacted with so George felt he had to eliminate him. Both George and Zampano are very effected by the deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina.

When they both recognize what they have actually done, they go back to the place where the story started. For Zampano and Gelsomina that is the ocean whereas for George and Lenny it is their own personal Eden in the woods. This is part of a reoccurring theme of cycles throughout these stories that are extremely essential to the story. La Strada starts with a shot of Gelsomina by the ocean, something similar to her. It goes with the circulation and doesn’t set up much resistance and is innocent and gorgeous. At the end of the film, when Zampano has actually recognized he is accountable for the death of Gelsomina he goes back to the sea.

The same is true for the beginning of Of Mice And Guy, George and Lenny had just established camp by a little river in the woods, a place where others had plainly been before. At the end of the book, Lenny was killed because extremely area after he ran away from the farm. These stories are both fantastic examples of classic character archetypes and clearly show the heroes journey. Lenny and Gelsomina both plainly have a call to adventure, for Lenny it is going to operate at a brand-new farm with George and for Gelsomina it is when Zampano buys her from her household.

They have their awakenings, Gelsomina’s is when the fool gives her the pebble and teaches her that whatever has a function, George’s is when he crushes Curly’s hand. They have their assistants, the Fool and all the other males on the farm. Their transformations are a little various, for George it would be when he eliminates Curly’s partner and understands he requires to run, for Gelsomina, though we don’t see it, it is when she realizes that she is alone and that Zampano has left her. Last of all is the return, unfortunately for our innocent characters this is connected into their deaths, and the real killing/realization of their deaths.