Of Mice and Men Compared to La Strada
Of Mice And Guy and La Strada Relative Essay Snead 3Y There are numerous books that share comparable concepts, such as comparable archetypal symbolism, journeys, or perhaps the exact same kinds of characters. One excellent example of this is Steinbeck’s Of Mice And Men and Fellini’s La Strada. When compared they have appear to have a lot in typical, from their similar character types to the over all journeys that take place in both of these terrific stories. In Fellini’s La Strada the primary character, Gelsomina, is really innocent and kid like.
This is revealed by frequently revealing her by the playful sea as well as being followed by animals and children throughout the movie. Then there is Zampano, a rather dull muscle male who doesn’t believe much prior to he acts. Yet, Gelsomina follows him with unwavering commitment throughout the film. Just as soon as does she appear to doubt her location with him and quickly after us seeing her doubt her location the Fool, an innocent lively man, puts her back in the state of mind that is her function. After all whatever has a purpose, even a pebble. The Fool, or Il Mato, is always messing with Zampano and is continuously outmaneuvering him.
Right from the first time we see these two characters it is clear that Zampano despises the fool and eventually chases after him with a knife. The knife represents Zampano’s physical approach to things and how he is viewed in regards to masculinity. The Fool continues tinkering Zampano, up until Zampano inadvertently kills him. His immediate thought it that his profession is over and this shows just how physical he is and how he sees whatever as “what can it provide for me? “. He purchased Gelsomina from her household, certainly not for her advantage however for his own.
This habits likewise shows in the way he deals with Rosa, he sees women as things that are there to benefit him. He didn’t understand his own strength and later on states in the film “It was just 2 punches, two punches! “. Here he’s clearly attempting to justify the wrong he unwittingly dedicated. This isn’t the only incorrect. Towards the end of the movie Zampano leaves Gelsomina with some money and her trumpet and years later on learns that she died because he left her there. I think that him leaving her was foreshadowing her death since there is no chance she would understand what to do, she didn’t know how to endure without him.
In Steinbeck’s Of Mice And Men, the main characters are the innocent arrested Lenny and his good friend George, both of whom are really strong workingmen who circumnavigate searching for physical labor that can be done. Lenny is mentally retarded and follows George like a pup. George is frequently around animals, from the little mouse he was carrying in his pocket to the puppy he liked so much. In the beginning of the book George utilized to mess with Lenny due to the fact that of his unwavering dedication but once he realized how genuine it was he stopped it immediately.
George is referred to as a fairly strong male who is extremely clever and does the believing for both him and Lenny. He keeps an eye out for Lenny and feels responsible for him. Lenny feels that his place is constantly right beside George. Nevertheless in the end of this book George abuses Lenny’s trust and murders him with the gun used to kill Candy’s pet around the time they arrived. He even killed him the same way that they killed the pet dog, one shot, right to the back of the head. I think Steinbeck having the pet eliminated, foreshadows the death of Lenny.
Not just that he will pass away, however that someone who likes him will be the one to eliminate him. I think it reveals that Lenny will die since he is always around animals, you’re supposed to associate him with animals and pets, which this dog isn’t like most other dogs much like Lenny isn’t like most other individuals. They both have things working versus them. For Lenny it’s being mentally retarded and for the canine it is the manner in which age has affected him. Both of these stories have a lot in common as far as stereotypical meaning goes. They both have the child-like, innocent character represented by Gelsomina and Lenny.
By having these characters in these pieces the audience is provided somebody to care about and feel connected to. These 2 both act and are treated quite like children which makes it simple for us to see them in an innocent, positive light offering us someone to be thinking about, we want to ensure they are alright which nothing bad happens to them. There are numerous methods you can inform how innocent these characters are, both are revealed with little animals a lot and Gelsomina is also shown in the same shot as the ocean a lot. These stories also have the physical male characters that very much impact the lives of the innocent characters.
These physical characters would be George and Zampano, while these 2 characters themselves have extremely little in typical as far as the time they lived and their occupation their personal tales draw an unexpected amount of parallels. These 2 are both protectors of the innocent characters, offered the task to supervise them and are accountable for Lenny and Gelsomina. Both George and Zampano end up eliminating their innocent buddy in the end. The deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina are both greatly foreshadowed. Zampano is extremely apparent with the reality that he doesn’t care what happens to Gelsomina and like needing to take care of her.
So when he leaves her by the side of the road it’s difficult to be shocked since this was something you could see him doing to Gelsomina because he always treated her like a problem. Nevertheless when George ends up killing Lenny it comes as a big shock to the reader because he had actually constantly liked and protected him. Even though he didn’t want to kill Lenny it was for the security of the people that Lenny communicated with so George felt he needed to eliminate him. Both George and Zampano are very effected by the deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina.
When they both realize what they have done, they go back to the location where the story began. For Zampano and Gelsomina that is the ocean whereas for George and Lenny it is their own personal Eden in the woods. This is part of a reoccurring theme of cycles throughout these stories that are really essential to the story. La Strada starts off with a shot of Gelsomina by the ocean, something just like her. It goes with the flow and doesn’t install much resistance and is innocent and beautiful. At the end of the movie, when Zampano has actually understood he is responsible for the death of Gelsomina he returns to the sea.
The very same holds true for the beginning of Of Mice And Guy, George and Lenny had simply established camp by a little river in the woods, a location where others had actually plainly been previously. At the end of the book, Lenny was eliminated because extremely spot after he fled from the farm. These stories are both excellent examples of timeless character archetypes and clearly show the heroes journey. Lenny and Gelsomina both plainly have a call to adventure, for Lenny it is going to work at a new farm with George and for Gelsomina it is when Zampano purchases her from her family.
They have their awakenings, Gelsomina’s is when the fool provides her the pebble and teaches her that everything has a purpose, George’s is when he crushes Curly’s hand. They have their helpers, the Fool and all the other men on the farm. Their changes are a little various, for George it would be when he kills Curly’s wife and recognizes he requires to run, for Gelsomina, though we do not see it, it is when she understands that she is alone which Zampano has left her. Last of all is the return, regrettably for our innocent characters this is connected into their deaths, and the actual killing/realization of their deaths.