Of Mice and Men: George Killed Lennie for Merciful Factors
Thesis Declaration: Analysis of how eliminating the incapable but suffering Lennie could have been the lower evil from his buddy’s perspective
- Intro: What are the fundamental values of friendship
- Humanistic background of why did George kill Lennie
- Killing as an act of mercy for an incapable and harmful person
- Arguments George utilizes to comfort Lennie in the death scene
- Conclusion: George’s killing his buddy to spare him from suffering
- Work Cited
A real friendship is one in which buddies care deeply adequate to prepare for one another’s needs and want to put their pal’s requirements prior to their own. Their shared love allows them to make sacrifices just to protect each other. In the novella, Of Mice and Male, by John Steinbeck, George eliminating Lennie is a merciful kill to conserve others from Lennie’s unintentional acts of hostility, to extra Lennie from suffering a vicious death, and rather ensuring a tranquil and quick departure one that will trigger George the least remorses.
Humanistic background of why did George eliminate Lennie
George begins to see a pattern of aggressiveness originating from Lennie and wants to put it to an end since Lennie is hurting too many others inadvertently and he sees Lennie is quick to frustrate and panic and is doing not have in the capability to control his violent reactions. Lennie has killed many mice, a pup, and finally a lady. Although Lennie may not wish to kill any other living beings, it remains in his nature to become aggressive and mad when annoyed. He generally thinks he “‘wasn’t doin’ nothing bad'” (Steinbeck 9) with the mice and he was “‘Jus’ strokin’ it'” (Steinbeck 9).
He can not contain his anger and that often results in an unrestrained usage of his strength. Since Lennie never has the objective to kill anything, he can feel an enormous quantity of regret and remorse as seen when he runs out of the barn sobbing, “‘I done a real bad thing … I should not of did that'” (Steinbeck 92), after killing Curley’s spouse. Regardless of Lennie’s remorse, he does not grasp the intensity and the effects of his actions. This is not a lot due to Lennie’s slowness but more because of George’s protective nature, avoiding Lennie from ever having to face any consequences.
Nevertheless, George sees that Lennie is not able to gain from his mistakes and fears the pattern is going to continue which he is unable to change Lennie. George feels warranted in killing Lennie since he understands that in the long run he would be able to spare many other lives and prevent Lennie from all the pain and distress from the regret Lennie feels after his hostilities. George’s choice to eliminate his best friend is to prevent a horrific and unjust fate that waits for Lennie unless there is some intervention. He does not want Lennie to be eliminated by Curley or sent to jail.
George plainly can sense Curley’s anger and vindictive nature about Lennie killing his partner. It is rather evident that Curley desires justice and vengeance and is determined to make Lennie suffer: “Curley’s face reddened. ‘I’m goin’… I’m gon na shoot the guts outta that huge bastard myself” (Steinbeck 98). Shooting Lennie in the gut would cause he him to gradually bleed to death, making sure a long, uncomfortable death. Even if Curley is not to prosper in eliminating Lennie in this gruesome way, the other likely outcome is that Lennie is sentenced and put in prison for potentially a life time.
Killing as an act of mercy for an incapable and dangerous individual
Initially, in light of the possibility of Curley’s revenge, George thinks about prison to be a safe haven: “Think … We got ta tell the … people. I think we got ta get ‘im an’ lock ‘im up. We can’t let ‘im escape …’ And he attempts to reassure himself, ‘Maybe they’ll lock ‘im up and be nice to ‘im” (Steinbeck 94). However, upon further factor to consider, George realizes that Lennie is incapable of surviving on his own and fending for himself in prison and will not last. Either result would lead to an unpleasant and slow death for Lennie, and George could not permit this to occur to his friend.
This is how he reaches the conclusion that it is necessary for George, himself, to eliminate Lennie in a humane fashion in order to give him a quick and serene death. By shooting Lennie himself, George minimizes his own discomfort for not letting Lennie pass away at the hands of a complete stranger and can likewise manage Lennie’s last thoughts and feelings. Previously on in the novella, Candy feels deep regret for not being the one to end his canine’s life and he tells George, “‘I oughtta shot that pet myself … I shouldn’t oughtta let no stranger shoot my pet dog'” (Steinbeck 61).
Arguments George utilizes to comfort Lennie in the death scene
Sweet and his dog were long-lasting good friends and companions, as were Lennie and George. Sweet’s remorse makes an enduring impression and Georges acknowledges that he too can not live letting anybody else take Lennie’s life. Additionally, he guarantees that Lennie last minutes are filled with joyous thoughts as he strikes up a conversation about Lennie’s favorite topic: “‘And I get to tend the rabbits. ‘” (Steinbeck 105) said Lennie, “‘An’ you get to tend the rabbits. ‘”(Steinbeck 105) responded George, then “Lennie giggled with happiness.” (Steinbeck 105).
And last but not least, as George’s last act of friendship, he assures Lennie with his last words that is he is not mad at Lennie nor that he’s ever been. This is to award Lennie with as much peace as a buddy could. In general, Lennie is in a much better place as soon as he dies. He does not to suffer a long and unpleasant death; he would not injure any other human beings or animals and is spared the resulting remorse. George feels great loss and is shaken afterward regardless of knowing he is justified in actions. This is a thoughtful murder and George is a real buddy. He keeps an eye out for Lennie’s needs and makes sacrifices to the end.