Of Mice and Guy: George Killed Lennie for Merciful Factors
Thesis Statement: Analysis of how killing the incapable however suffering Lennie could have been the lower evil from his friend’s viewpoint
- Introduction: What are the standard worths of friendship
- Humanistic background of why did George eliminate Lennie
- Killing as an act of grace for an incapable and harmful person
- Arguments George uses to comfort Lennie in the death scene
- Conclusion: George’s eliminating his friend to spare him from suffering
- Work Pointed out
A true relationship is one in which pals care deeply enough to prepare for one another’s requirements and want to put their good friend’s needs prior to their own. Their shared love enables them to make sacrifices only to safeguard each other. In the novella, Of Mice and Male, by John Steinbeck, George eliminating Lennie is a merciful kill to save others from Lennie’s unintentional acts of hostility, to extra Lennie from suffering a vicious death, and rather making sure a peaceful and quick departure one that will trigger George the least remorses.
Humanistic background of why did George kill Lennie
George starts to see a pattern of aggression originating from Lennie and wants to put it to an end since Lennie is injuring a lot of others accidentally and he sees Lennie is quick to annoy and panic and is doing not have in the capability to control his violent responses. Lennie has actually killed numerous mice, a puppy, and lastly a lady. Although Lennie may not wish to kill any other living beings, it is in his nature to end up being aggressive and angry when annoyed. He usually thinks he “‘wasn’t doin’ nothing bad'” (Steinbeck 9) with the mice and he was “‘Jus’ strokin’ it'” (Steinbeck 9).
He can not include his anger and that often results in an unrestrained use of his strength. Due to the fact that Lennie never ever has the intention to eliminate anything, he can feel a tremendous amount of regret and remorse as seen when he lacks the barn weeping, “‘I done a real bad thing … I should not of did that'” (Steinbeck 92), after eliminating Curley’s wife. Regardless of Lennie’s remorse, he does not comprehend the severity and the repercussions of his actions. This is not so much due to Lennie’s slowness but more due to the fact that of George’s protective nature, preventing Lennie from ever needing to face any consequences.
However, George sees that Lennie is unable to gain from his errors and fears the pattern is going to continue which he is unable to change Lennie. George feels warranted in killing Lennie due to the fact that he understands that in the long run he would have the ability to spare many other lives and avoid Lennie from all the pain and distress from the regret Lennie feels after his aggressiveness. George’s decision to eliminate his buddy is to prevent a horrific and undeserved fate that waits for Lennie unless there is some intervention. He does not want Lennie to be eliminated by Curley or sent to prison.
George plainly can pick up Curley’s anger and vindictive nature about Lennie killing his other half. It is rather apparent that Curley wants justice and vengeance and is figured out to make Lennie suffer: “Curley’s face reddened. ‘I’m goin’… I’m gon na shoot the guts outta that huge bastard myself” (Steinbeck 98). Shooting Lennie in the gut would cause he him to gradually bleed to death, making sure a long, agonizing death. Even if Curley is not to succeed in killing Lennie in this gruesome manner, the other likely outcome is that Lennie is sentenced and put in jail for potentially a lifetime.
Killing as an act of grace for an incapable and hazardous person
At first, because of the possibility of Curley’s vengeance, George considers prison to be a safe house: “Guess … We got ta inform the … men. I think we got ta get ‘im an’ lock ‘im up. We can’t let ‘im escape …’ And he attempts to reassure himself, ‘Possibly they’ll lock ‘im up and be good to ‘im” (Steinbeck 94). However, upon additional consideration, George realizes that Lennie is incapable of surviving on his own and taking care of himself in prison and will not last. Either result would lead to a miserable and sluggish death for Lennie, and George could not allow this to take place to his best friend.
This is how he reaches the conclusion that it is necessary for George, himself, to eliminate Lennie in a gentle fashion in order to offer him a fast and peaceful death. By shooting Lennie himself, George decreases his own pain for not letting Lennie die at the hands of a stranger and can likewise manage Lennie’s last ideas and feelings. Previously on in the novella, Candy feels deep regret for not being the one to end his canine’s life and he tells George, “‘I oughtta shot that dog myself … I should not oughtta let no complete stranger shoot my canine'” (Steinbeck 61).
Arguments George uses to comfort Lennie in the death scene
Candy and his pet were lifelong good friends and buddies, as were Lennie and George. Candy’s regret makes an enduring impression and Georges recognizes that he too can not live letting anyone else take Lennie’s life. Moreover, he ensures that Lennie last moments are filled with wondrous thoughts as he strikes up a conversation about Lennie’s preferred subject: “‘And I get to tend the rabbits. ‘” (Steinbeck 105) stated Lennie, “‘An’ you get to tend the rabbits. ‘”(Steinbeck 105) reacted George, then “Lennie giggled with joy.” (Steinbeck 105).
And finally, as George’s last act of relationship, he assures Lennie with his last words that is he is not mad at Lennie nor that he’s ever been. This is to award Lennie with as much peace as a pal could. Overall, Lennie is in a much better location once he dies. He does not to suffer a long and painful death; he would not harm any other humans or animals and is spared the resulting remorse. George feels terrific loss and is shaken later regardless of knowing he is warranted in actions. This is a thoughtful murder and George is a real buddy. He looks out for Lennie’s requirements and makes sacrifices to the end.