Romeo and Juliet: Contradicting Concepts
Throughout Romeo and Juliet there are lots of contradictions. The play demonstrates both good and evil in individuals in addition to their love and hate. Shakespeare teaches that it is possible to do the impossible. Considering that they are enemy families it would be impossible for Romeo and Juliet to be together, however we find out that anything is possible. This results in death since it really was difficult for Romeo and Juliet to be together and happy with their lives. A forbidden love triggers 2 enemies to break boundaries and defy their backgrounds. One example of defiance and obedience would be in Act 4 Scene 1 (lines 91-92).
In this passage Friar Lawrence tells Juliet to go along with the strategies to marry Paris despite the fact that she currently married her dear Romeo. Friar informs Juliet that he will think about a plan to fix this issue. Friar is defying the Capulet’s by informing them that Juliet will wed Paris. However Friar is being obedient to Juliet’s orders by coming up with a strategy to get her out of this marital relationship. An example of love and hate would be in Act 3 Scene 5 (lines 166-177). Lord Capulet threatens his child Juliet that if she does not marry Paris then she will be tossed out and be disowned by her father.
Whereas in Act 1 Scene 2 when Paris asks Lord Capulet to wed Juliet Capulet says that it would depend on Juliet and what she chooses. From both of these antitheses we can discover that deep down everybody cares for each other and are just trying to do the ideal thing. Even though Capulet threatened Juliet he cares deeply about her and would be squashed if something bad occurred to her. In some cases enjoyed ones attempt to safeguard one another so they will not get harmed. Regardless of an action that one performs they will always be accepted with their pals.