Social Inequality in to Eliminate a Mockingbird
Social Inequality in to Kill a Mockingbird. Consider social inequality. Is it reasonable for people to be ranked and divided just since of their social status? Maybe you’re considering the high school social rankings but it’s more than that. People are being dealt with according to their social classes by the colour of their skin or their household background or monetary status, all elements that we do not have an option in. Take the Royal family for example. They are on the top of the pyramid, merely due to the fact that of their status and wealth; individuals will treat them in a different way to how they would treat us commoners.
They are deemed superior simply since they are the Royals, however it is just since they were born into that family with a silver spoon in their mouths. What about those homeless individuals on the streets? Would you treat them the same way you would treat the royals? In To Eliminate a Mockingbird, the Finches were a pretty well off household with Atticus being related to nearly everyone in town and his job as a legal representative supplied adequate cash to support his family. The Cunningham family on the other hand, are bad famers that attempt to scrape along with what they have.
They are mocked since of their lack of wealth, and because they were ‘Cunninghams’. Although the Cunninghams are bad, they are reputable since they find other methods to pay instead of cash. Scout is uninformed of such things as social standings, but is nevertheless, mindful that the Cunninghams are bad; and mentions rather helpfully to her very first grade instructor Miss Caroline, that Walter Cunningham is ‘a Cunningham’ so he would never ever be able to repay her quarter if she had actually provided it to him.
Appropriate Topics Readers Also Choose
- Why Is Atticus A Good Father
Later Scout is revolted by Walter’s consuming manners, which leads to her being scolded by Calpurnia to not judge somebody due to the fact that of whether they were poor or not. Even if the Cunninghams were bad, they were absolutely nothing compared to the Ewells. They were normal ‘white garbage’ characters that dealt with terrible hygiene, ignorant and did not follow the law. The Ewells were thought about the worst of the worst with their tacky good manners and language. Many people avoided them but pitied them much like Tom did for Mayella. However he helping her only led to landing him a court case and eventually death.
However even listed below the Ewells on the social pyramid is the black neighborhood. They are considered even worse than the Ewells because they are Negroes. The colour of their skin chose their social status and individuals evaluated them simply due to the fact that of that. They endured far worse treatment than the Ewells or the Cunninghams. Social inequality in to Eliminate a Mockingbird simply goes to reveal if individuals are identified ‘Cunningham’ or ‘Ewell’ or ‘Negro’. It is pigeonholing individuals into someone might not be. Social status does not choose the people we are and individuals must be treated equally no matter what.