The Crucible– The Difference Between Law and Justice
The Crucial Difference Between Law and Justice Are law and justice the exact same thing? Numerous think the concept that if one disobeys the law, they should be brought to trial. However, this isn’t constantly the case. The fact that there is law permitting or forbidding an act that does not figure out that it is ideal or incorrect. While justice is suggested to be administered with the utmost fairness and equality, Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible demonstrates that this does not always dominate. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, the citizens of Salem appear to think that law and justice are the same thing.
However, this is not true. In act 3, Danforth says “You must understand, sir, that an individual is either with this court or he must be counted versus it, there be no road in between. This is a sharp time, now, an exact time– we live no longer in the dusky afternoon when evil combined itself with excellent and bewildered the world. Now, by God’s grace, the shining sun is up, and them that worry not light will definitely praise it (Danforth, 90).” When Danforth states this, it reveals that he thinks that unless somebody was ruling with the court, then they protested it, and therefore, evil.
Clearly, Salem does not practice separation of church and state, which at the time made for a lot of bigotry and religious-driven harm and persecution. Due to the fact that the Bible says that any woman that commits the sin of lechery ought to be stoned to death, that does not make it humane or warranted. The citizens of Salem appear to lack the capability to comprehend that. A hidden theme within The Crucible is theocracy; God is apparently the ultimate leader, judge, and arbiter. The method Salem sees it, God requires guys on earth to instill justice in the lives of the residents of earth.
Hathorne, Danforth, Parris, and Hale were all part of that system. Though it appears that only those who admitted to having dedicated severe sins against God, in addition to those who declined to confess had a sense of that justice. Salem thought that God was speaking through the women to expose crimes that would have been invisible otherwise. “However witchcraft is ipso facto, on its face and by its nature, an undetectable crime, is it not? For that reason, who may possibly be to witness it? The witch and the victim.
None other. Now we can not hope the witch to accuse herself; approved? For that reason we need to rely upon her victims– and they do testify, the kids certainly to testify. When it comes to the witches, none will deny that we are most excited for all their confessions. For that reason, what is left for a lawyer to bring out? I think I have made my point. Have I not (Danforth, 96)?” In this quote, Danforth explains that just the kids would understand of witchcraft in the town which they have no other way of understanding the crime is devoted.
He was clearly ignorant, as Abigail and the girls she has convinced to play along were only children and teenagers. They would most absolutely yearn for attention at their age, and would make the most of any type of it that they could get. The court appears to ignore this and takes the word of the ladies throughout most of the play. Not a single among the allegations throughout the Salem Witch Trials is done out of worry. Each and every single among them is due to a character trying to preserve their own credibility or as an attempt to accomplish their own self-centered ambitions.
And aside from this, Danforth selected to ignore several things that would prove the implicated to be innocent, or at least offer factor to question what the accusers are stating. It seems that the accusers are always right, no matter what the situations of the allegations. It is discarded that Abigail and John had an affair because Danforth and Hathorne did whatever in their power to prevent thinking the affair happened. It is neglected that Putnam clearly wants Giles Corey’s land, and he easily implicates the male of witchcraft.
When one is implicated of witchcraft, their land is cost a much smaller amount than it is worth. Giles Corey accuses Thomas Putnam of being an opportunist of the worst kind, as his land would be sold and Putnam would have the first opportunity to purchase it. “My evidence exists! Pointing to the paper. If Jacobs hangs for a witch he forfeit his property– that’s law! And there is none however Putnam with the coin to purchase so fantastic a piece. This guy is killing his next-door neighbors for their land (Corey, 92)!” Francis Nurse attempts time and time once again to bring proof to the court however he is unable to provide it.
Appropriate Subjects Readers Also Pick
- Who Is The Tragic Hero Of The Crucible
The apparent reasoning for this is that Danforth is stressed over his track record. He has too much pride to confess that he believes Abigail and Tituba and the others that brought accusations against the innocent individuals of Salem. Instead, Danforth would rather those who had not done anything incorrect, suffer in his location for his lack of knowledge and selfishness. So perhaps, Danforth did have a sense of justice as the accused did, however he would rather keep peaceful about it since his own credibility is more vital than the lives of others. The “justice” system in Salem is based on religious belief, more than the real law.
This being true, the evidence is mostly supernatural, and therefore can not be countered with reason or hard evidence. The only people that had to prove their case are those that disagree with the accusers. Accusers are instantly presumed to be informing the reality and do not require an ounce of proof. They might be questioned, but they are always considered right. This kind of law is not ethical in today’s justice system; innocent till tested guilty. While Salem has a type of law, there is no sense of justice in the neighborhood.