In the Letter from Birmingham Prison, Martin Luther King Jr. utilizes persuasive speech to react to the opposition. King structures his language to follow a method resembling the Rogerian Argument, which combats the oppression versus humanity. By plainly stating the problem, restating the opponents position and the merit it holds, summarizing his own position, showing why his position has merit, and concluding with a proposal which interest both sides in the conflict, King successfully counters the clergymens letter with fairness and sincerity.
In the Letter from Birmingham Prison, the message represented is listening with understanding. The letter is presented in a discussion way, instead of a monologue. King reiterates the general problem, and after that continues to summarize what his challengers have stated. The resistance is originated from a public declaration by 8 clergymen from Alabama. In this declaration, the clergymen both condemn his work and support the oppression shown by the police. King is able to show an understanding of the clergymans positions and the different outlooks of all America by summing up the viewpoints of the clergymen. He acknowledges their arguments, providing equal regard and definition, and after that contests them, by discussing their faults. For instance, King deals with the charges brought versus him, and proceeds to explain why the charges were unfair. A law is unfair if it is caused on a minority that, as a result of being rejected the right to vote, had no part in enacting or creating the law. He likewise brings to attention the clergymans displeasure of the demonstrations, and describes why their position has no merit. You deplore the presentations taking place in Birmingham. But your statement, I am sorry to state, fails to reveal a similar issue for the conditions that brought about the presentations. He gives merit to their argument, however then gets rid of the worth in their grievance. This technique encourages the reader to side with King, since he has removed the value of the challengers position.
When summarizing his own position, King presents examples and then concludes with their value and significance to the fight for equivalent human rights only after he has actually responded to the opposition. These realities consist of: the awful record of brutality, grossly unfair treatment in courts, and unsolved battles of Negro houses and churches, supporting his position. The Rogerian technique supplies each side of the argument a chance to make and support their position.
Kings letter to the Alabama clergymen ends with a proposition. This proposition is similar to that of a plea for justice. Through the facility of a commonalities, King connects to those who have experienced racial injustice in Birmingham, and extends it to those who have actually had any form of incorrect treatment in America. Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon die and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be raised from our fear-drenched communities, and in some not too remote tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great country with all their scintillating charm. The proposal which King concludes with follows along the Rogerian lines by attracting the self-interest of bothe sides in the conflict.
Martin Luther Kings skilled letter, Letter from a Birmingham Jail, and flair for word option assaulted the supremacy which was held versus the African Americans. King effectively states the issue, sums up and refutes his opponents position, provides his own position shows its benefit, and concludes with a proposition that reached everyonemodeling the Rogerian argument for his position.