To Kill a Mockingbird- Was Justice Served for Tom?

To Eliminate a Mockingbird- Was Justice Served for Tom?Was Justice Served for Thomas in To Kill a Mockingbird? The dictionary defines the word justice as the objective adjustment of conflicting claims. Malcolm X, a civil liberties leader who battled versus oppression specifies justice by mentioning, “I am a Muslim, because it’s a religion that teaches you an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. It teaches you to respect everyone, and treat everyone right. However it likewise teaches you if someone steps on your toe, chop off their foot. And I carry my religious axe with me all the time.” (Good Reads).

The oppressions committed against minorities birthed the civil rights motion, and influenced leaders like Malcolm X. Sadly, the miscarriage of justice in our history is overly common in the legal systems and law enforcement agencies; the fight for justice is not fought entirely against other individuals, but rather against systems, systems that were taken into place to prolong the enslavement mindset of Blacks and keep them oppressed. These practices are commonplace in the rural South throughout the 30’s which is the area and times setting of Christopher Sergel’s play To Kill a Mockingbird.

Impartiality may not have actually been the theme in this period in regards to the treatment of Blacks, nevertheless; To Kill a Mockingbird challenges our analysis of justice as it might be enforced beyond justice systems. This story brings to light the cruel, imbalanced oppression within the legal system towards Blacks who have actually been implicated of criminal activities by Whites. At the same time, we are exposed to the counter movements of certain people in the neighborhood, who have the perfectionist of intentions in their battle against injustice.

In this story, within the legal system, the question of justice is responded to blatantly, no; it was not served for the individual, Thomas Robinson, the young man being incorrectly accused of rape, founded guilty and ultimately killed. In the after-effects of events following Thomas’s conviction, his accuser, Bob Ewell was killed and the reader is delegated consider the concern, if legal justice was not served for Thomas, was justice served for Thomas in any other type? During the 30’s in the South, the justice system was a reputable system with unbiased rules that were created to ensure individuals were innocent till roven guilty, sadly; the jury system did not promote the exact same virtues. Throughout the trial scenes in To Eliminate a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch, who is the court appointed lawyer for Thomas, is affective in demonstrating that his customer did not have the physical ability to devote the rape and pounding of the victim. He demonstrates this a number of methods for example, proving that the victim was beaten on the best side of her face throughout the testament of the person Heck who, when questioned by Atticus states, “That ‘d make it her right. It was her right eye, Mr. Finch. I remember now, she was banged up on that side of her face. (1. 55). Atticus shows Thomas’s failure to use his left hand, specifying, “Tom, stand up. Let Miss Mayella have an excellent take a look at you. Is this the man, Miss Mayella? (Tom stands. He is an effective boy, but his left hand is snuggled and held to his chest.) (2. 66). We find out through the continuing dialog that Tom’s left hand was caught in a cotton gin and tore all the muscles loose. During the cross exam of Bob Ewell, who is the accuser, Atticus establishes that Bob Ewell is left handed, Atticus asks, “Would you write your name for us,” Judge Taylor validates, “He’s left-handed. (2. 61). With this physical evidence, a jury needs to have developed by sensible doubt that Tom was incapable of dedicating the criminal activity he was being implicated of. Instead, the jury discovered him guilty and he was imprisoned, where he as shot dead. Justice was not served by the legal system for Tom. Throughout the trial, Atticus effectively made the community suspicious of Bob Ewell, the victim’s dad, of being the real person who dedicated the crime. In retaliation, Bob Ewell threatened Atticus’s life.

Towards the end of the story, Atticus’s kids are assaulted and Heck, the constable, visits Atticus to upgrade him on who assaulted his children. Heck states, “Bob Ewell’s lyin on the ground yonder with a kitchen knife held up under his ribs. He’s dead. Mr. Finch.” (2. 99). According to Wikipedia, the interpretation of the expression, “an eye for an eye” states, “An eye for an eye, is the concept that a person who has actually injured another individual is similarly injured in retribution, or according to other analyses the victim receives the value of the injury in compensation. (Wikipedia) Tom passed away, and his accuser passed away, but was justice served? Although Bob Ewell lost his life it wasn’t as an outcome of the oppression that was committed upon Tom through the legal system, or due to the fact that Tom was shot dead in prison; Bob Ewell’s death was a result of his attack on Atticus’s kids, not as a result of Tom’s death. Alternatively, Bob Ewell was the reason for his own fate, based upon his incrimination of Tom. Atticus would not have safeguarded Tom, which was the reason Bob Ewell assaulted Atticus’s kids, and since of his attack on Atticus’s kids, Bob Ewell was eliminated. Just as gravity is a law of the physical world, so is karma a law of the spiritual world. We are delegated our actions and, more specifically, for the objective of our actions.” (Judith Johnson). In this story, Bob Ewell is the victim of his karma and on the basis of this theory; justice is served against Bob Ewell. Serving justice has several meanings, the legal service of justice, an “eye for an eye” and karma is jointly prevalent in the theme of justice in To Kill a Mockingbird.

Justice was served for Atticus’s children and for Atticus, but sadly, justice was not served for Tom in the sense of the theory, an “eye for an eye.” In this story, Tom’s incrimination was unjustified, and his death as an outcome was unjustified and none of the occasions proceeding his unjustly imprisonment resulted in justice for Tom. The readers mind may by at ease by the death of the antagonist in the end, however; his death does not functioned as justice for the innocent victim, Tom.