To what extent can Tybalt truely be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.

To what degree can Tybalt truely be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.Tybalt is shown

as a bad guy in Romeo and Juliet but just how much can he actually be blamed? Tybalt is a proud and patriotic Capulet cousin, his name reflects his character (tybalt means the prince of cats) he is an uncommon swordsman and fights with honor, although he does take personal insults extremely far he can be viewed in two ways, initially as a racist, prejudiced against the Montagues or second as an honorable male who fights for household and what he thinks to be right, Mercoutio describes him as More than prince of felines, I can inform you. O, he is the brave captain of compliments. He combats as you sing prick-song, keeps time, range, and percentage; rests me his minim rest, one, 2, and the 3rd in your bosom: the really butcher of a silk button, a duellist, a duellist; a gentleman of the really first home, of the first and second cause,” (2. 4. 26) In scene 1 act 1 Rioting has actually broken out between the 2 families, Tybalt must be delegated turning down a deal of peace from the Montagues, What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee: Have at thee, coward!” (1. 1. 72) Nevertheless following the riot Tybalt and indeed all Capulets and Montagues are provided a warning that if violence is broken out once again somebody will pay the price “If ever you disrupt our streets again, Your lives will pay the surrender of the peace.” (1. 1. 97) In this Tybalt does receive a caution so although he can be blamed for worsening a fight in act 1 scene 1 he can not be additional punished.

Some would believe that Tybalt does not really listen to the Princes warning which shows a disrespect for authority which is all part of the factor that the Capulets and the Montagues are fighting anyhow given that, in Act 3 scene 1 Tybalt comes back to fight Romeo but in reality Tybalt is not trying to interrupt the peace, he is simply trying to win his own back on Romeo. When Romeo, Mercoutio, Benvolio and several other Montagues Gatecrash the Capulet celebration they are simply doing it out of fun however to Tybalt it is an act of dishonor, he even tries to attack Romeo during the celebration, This, by his voice, must be a Montague. Fetch me my rapier, boy. What attempts the slave Come hither, cover ‘d with an antic face, To fleer and reject at our solemnity? Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, To strike him dead, I hold it not a sin.” (1. 5. 59) however is avoided by Capulet who is feeling generous, when Tybalt challenges him Capulet knows that the worst penalty he can dispense is to hurt his honor so he treats Tybalt Like a naughty boy, “He shall be endured: What, goodman boy! I say, he shall: go to; Am I the master here, or you? go to. You’ll not endure him!

God shall mend my soul! You’ll make a mutiny amongst my guests! You will set cock-a-hoop! you’ll be the male!” (1. 5. 81) This leads Tybalt to blame his punishment on Romeo and chooses to combat him to likewise restore his honor When Romeo does not react to the letter that Tybalt sends out to Romeo providing him a challenge Tybalt sees this as much more of a dishonor and now rages, The fight that occurred between Mercutio and Tybalt can not be completely blamed on Mercutio. Tybalt must carry some of the blame, as he was the one that confronted them, making impolite remarks about Romeo thou art a villain.” (3. 1. 61) “For that reason turn and draw.” (3. 1. 67) The second quote is when Tybalt difficulties Romeo to a sword battle, this is when Mercutio actions in and Tybalt is more than delighted to eliminate and beat him. To make matters worse, Tybalt returns to where he has just eliminated Mercutio, after he realises that no one knows what has happened (other than for individuals that were there) and challenges Romeo once again. This time Romeo, acting on behalf of his dead friend attempts to get revenge by agreeing to battle with Tybalt.

This is where Romeo ends up being the one to blame. If Romeo had accepted that his pal was dead then he would not have killed Tybalt and rather gone to mourn over Mercutio. This would have indicated that Tybalt would have been penalized rather of Romeo. In conclusion I think that Tybalt is in reality simply a male raised with the concept that Montagues are inferior and Capulets superior, although he has a prejudice versus the Montagues I don’t believe that he is to blame for what took place since he does not intentionally attempt to cause suffering.