Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and juliet essay: who plays a disaster Romeo and Juliet: Who is accountable for the Catastrophe? Does Fate play a role? Who is accountable? This question is always asked of any dispute, and generally nobody wants to confess that it was his/her fault. It then must be identified what the conflict was, who is responsible, and to what extent. Shakespeare’s, Romeo and Juliet, is based on a conflict.

In Romeo and Juliet the conflict becomes a disaster. Now that we know what the dispute was, which is a disaster, the next step is to determine what a disaster is?

A disaster is a conflict that winds up with something extremely sad taking place. In Romeo and Juliet, the disaster, is that both of these fans kill themselves, to join the other in death. “For never was a story of more woe Than this of Juliet and her Romeo” (5,3,309-310). The next action in the problem fixing procedure is to examine who is to blame for the tragedy. To do this we should first identify the various kinds of roles played in a conflict. There are 5 primary roles; there is cause, an instigator, retaliator, passivist, and mediator.

The first is the cause, which can be a person or thing, that begins everything, and in some cases people don’t even understand that they are playing this part. In Romeo and Juliet, among the causes is the ancient feud between the families. Tybalt says “What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I dislike hell, all Montagues and thee.” (1. 1. 61-62) The second is the instigator, who is typically extremely imply, and something that they do or say, is usually the cause of conflict. What this individual does or states is meant to provoke someone.

Tybalt states to Romeo “Romeo, the love I bear thee can manage No much better term than this: thou art a villain. “(3. 1. 53,54). These words are developed to provoke Romeo to fight. The third function, is that of the retaliator, who responds to the provocative nature of the instigator. Mercutio states to Tybalt “Accompaniment? What, dost thou make us minstrels? And thou make minstrels people, want to hear nothing however discords. Here’s my fiddlestick, here’s that will make you dance”(3. 1. 40-43) in retaliation to a spoken jab made by Tybalt. The fourth is the passivist, who does nothing to prevent or assist in the conflict.

Usually somebody who hasn’t chosen who is best and hasn’t picked a side. The fifth is the moderator, who is trying to avoid or stop the conflict from happening. Benvolio is trying to avoid a fight when he states “I pray thee, great Mercutio, let’s retire: The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, An if we meet we shall not get away a brawl, In the meantime, these hot days, is the mad blood stirring.” Now that we have identified the roles played in a conflict, it makes the next step, of determining who is accountable, and to what extent simpler. Shakespeare wrote this disaster with a great deal of complexity to it.

I know this since each of individuals included play more than one role throughout the play. First the Ancient Animosity, is a cause of combating in between the families. It has actually played a significant function in the development of hatred in a few of individuals, for example, Tybalt has picked up a hatred for the Montagues, from his Uncle Old Capulet. This Ancient Animosity has actually caused two brawls previous to the one we see at the start of the play. Prince says “Three civil brawls, bred of an airy word, By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, Have actually thrice disrupted the quiet of our streets. “(1. 1. 1-83) By this speech we find out of the nature of the ancient animosity. I think that the ancient animosity is to be blamed for a fair bit of the catastrophe, viewing as none of the fighting would have taken place if there was no grudge, and Romeo would have been permitted to wed Juliet, without the secrecy. 2nd Tybalt is to be blamed for most of the tragedy, since he began the very first fight on the street. He likewise started the fight on the beach. He eliminated Mercutio, which caused Romeo to retaliate and kill him. Throughout the play Tybalt is constantly the provocateur, he is always searching for a fight.

He states himself that he hates peace “What, drawn and talk of peace? I dislike the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. “(1. 1. 61,62) Romeo played a crucial function in the disaster, however ought to not be blamed for any of the disaster. He played the role of a Mediator, most of the time, like when he was on the beach and Tybalt challenged him to eliminate he states “Tybalt, the factor that I need to enjoy thee Doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a welcoming. Villain am I none; Therefore farewell, I see thou knowest me not. “(3. 1. 5-58) He also plays the function of the retaliator when Tybalt kills Mercutio. Romeo pursues Tybalt to avenge Mercutio’s death. Romeo states “for Mercutio’s soul is however a little method above our heads, remaining for thine to keep him Business: Either thou or I, or both should opt for him. “(3. 1. 117-120) so in this sense Romeo’s only fault was that he killed Tybalt, but Tybalt had tried to kill him, and had actually eliminated Mercutio, so Romeo must not be blamed. Mercutio’s is but, an extremely little bit to blame, for his own death, that made Romeo kill Tybalt, and after that get Banished for that crime.

Mercutio wasn’t going looking for a battle, However he wasn’t looking not to fight either. When Tybalt, comes and wants to fight, so Mercutio reacts by challenging him to a battle also. Mercutio states, “Here’s my fiddlestick, here’s that shall make you dance. “(3. 1. 41,42) We also learn that he is extremely happy. “Guys’s eyes were made to look, and let them gaze; I will not budge for no male’s satisfaction, I. “(3. 1. 47,48) From these passages, from the book, I have actually decided that Mercutio played the function of the retaliator.

For that reason his fault is only in that of Tybalt’s, so that he should only be slightly blamed. Benvolio’s Function in this dispute was nothing however as a passivist/moderator. I came to this conclusion when he says things like “I pray thee, excellent Mercutio, let’s retire: The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, And if we satisfy we shall not leave a brawl” And “We talk here in the public haunt of guys: Either withdraw unto some personal location, or Reason coldly of your complaints, Or else depart; here all eyes look on us. “(3. 1. 43-46) By these speeches he is constantly attempting to prevent or delay the fight.

In this case Benvolio is not to blame at all, but rather must be applauded for his efforts for peace. Friar Lawerence is to be blamed likewise, for he had terrific idea’s of peace after he married Juliet to Romeo. He verified the marriage of these 2 people, because of his concepts, and he didn’t do the ideal thing, which would be to tell the moms and dads, and make them see that Romeo and Juliet were really in love. And to let the parents decide what would be best. He messed that up, and then he screwed up some more, when he assisted Juliet to deceive her parents, by faking her death.

He continues to screw up to safeguard his original error of marrying Romeo and Juliet. Juliet’s Moms and dads likewise contributed by requiring her to marry Paris, and this forced her to fake her death, to leave her marriage, and to get to Romeo. They were uninformed of her previous marital relationship, so it is not actually their fault. After determining this, there is still some confusion over the fault of some people, so that we have to consider another aspect, which might make things a little clearer. That factor is fate. Prior to determining what function fate played we should initially figure out the significance of fate.

Fate stems from the Ancient Greek Mythologies, when there were 3 female goddesses, who were believed to spin a thread that was your life, and they would shake it, to shake up your life. It was likewise thought that the Fates were in charge of when you died and when you did die, they cut the thread. To make that more clear, Fate, is when something occurs or is going to happen, and you have no control over it. It informs us right in the prologue that Romeo and Juliet’s love is fated “A pair of star-crossed fans take their life. I don’t actually think in fate, however in this fictional catastrophe, fate was an excellent choice to explain some of the important things that occurred. In conclusion this exciting awful love, has actually made use of an elaborate web, in the obligation for the disaster, so that nobody can be held completely accountable, and no one is left without a part in catastrophe. The way that Shakespeare makes an individual play more than among the basic roles, throughout the dispute, is a sensational method to spark interest, since individuals are puzzled by a sudden change of mindset or character. This procedure leaves the audience, trying to comprehend, so they become intrigued.