Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and juliet essay: who plays a disaster Romeo and Juliet: Who is accountable for the Tragedy? Does Fate contribute? Who is accountable? This concern is constantly asked of any conflict, and typically nobody wants to confess that it was his or her fault. It then must be identified what the dispute was, who is responsible, and to what level. Shakespeare’s, Romeo and Juliet, is based upon a conflict.

In Romeo and Juliet the dispute turns into a tragedy. Now that we understand what the conflict was, which is a disaster, the next step is to determine what a disaster is?

A disaster is a conflict that winds up with something extremely unfortunate happening. In Romeo and Juliet, the tragedy, is that both of these fans eliminate themselves, to sign up with the other in death. “For never ever was a story of more concern Than this of Juliet and her Romeo” (5,3,309-310). The next action in the issue fixing procedure is to evaluate who is to blame for the disaster. To do this we need to initially figure out the different types of functions played in a conflict. There are 5 primary functions; there is cause, an instigator, retaliator, passivist, and moderator.

The very first is the cause, which can be an individual or thing, that begins whatever, and sometimes individuals do not even understand that they are playing this part. In Romeo and Juliet, among the causes is the ancient feud in between the families. Tybalt states “What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues and thee.” (1. 1. 61-62) The 2nd is the instigator, who is usually extremely indicate, and something that they do or state, is usually the reason for dispute. What this individual does or says is meant to provoke someone.

Tybalt states to Romeo “Romeo, the love I bear thee can pay for No much better term than this: thou art a villain. “(3. 1. 53,54). These words are developed to provoke Romeo to fight. The third function, is that of the retaliator, who responds to the provocative nature of the provocateur. Mercutio states to Tybalt “Accompaniment? What, dost thou make us minstrels? And thou make minstrels people, aim to hear absolutely nothing however discords. Here’s my fiddlestick, here’s that shall make you dance”(3. 1. 40-43) in retaliation to a spoken jab made by Tybalt. The fourth is the passivist, who not does anything to impede or assist in the conflict.

Typically someone who hasn’t chosen who is best and hasn’t picked a side. The fifth is the mediator, who is trying to avoid or stop the conflict from happening. Benvolio is trying to prevent a fight when he states “I pray thee, great Mercutio, let’s retire: The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, An if we satisfy we shall not get away a brawl, In the meantime, these hot days, is the mad blood stirring.” Now that we have determined the functions played in a conflict, it makes the next action, of identifying who is accountable, and to what level much easier. Shakespeare wrote this catastrophe with a lot of intricacy to it.

I know this due to the fact that each of individuals involved play more than one role throughout the play. Initially the Ancient Grudge, is a cause of combating between the families. It has actually played a significant function in the advancement of hatred in some of individuals, for example, Tybalt has actually gotten a hatred for the Montagues, from his Uncle Old Capulet. This Ancient Animosity has triggered 2 brawls previous to the one we see at the start of the play. Prince states “3 civil brawls, bred of an airy word, By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, Have thrice interrupted the quiet of our streets. “(1. 1. 1-83) By this speech we discover of the nature of the ancient animosity. I believe that the ancient grudge is to be blamed for quite a bit of the tragedy, viewing as none of the fighting would have happened if there was no grudge, and Romeo would have been permitted to marry Juliet, without the secrecy. Second Tybalt is to be blamed for the majority of the catastrophe, since he began the first battle on the street. He likewise began the battle on the beach. He eliminated Mercutio, which triggered Romeo to retaliate and kill him. Throughout the play Tybalt is always the instigator, he is always searching for a battle.

He states himself that he dislikes peace “What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I dislike hell, all Montagues, and thee. “(1. 1. 61,62) Romeo played an essential role in the catastrophe, but must not be blamed for any of the disaster. He played the role of a Mediator, the majority of the time, like when he was on the beach and Tybalt challenged him to combat he says “Tybalt, the factor that I need to enjoy thee Doth much reason the appertaining rage to such a greeting. Villain am I none; Therefore goodbye, I see thou knowest me not. “(3. 1. 5-58) He also plays the function of the retaliator when Tybalt eliminates Mercutio. Romeo pursues Tybalt to avenge Mercutio’s death. Romeo says “for Mercutio’s soul is however a little way above our heads, remaining for thine to keep him Company: Either thou or I, or both need to choose him. “(3. 1. 117-120) so in this sense Romeo’s only fault was that he killed Tybalt, however Tybalt had actually attempted to eliminate him, and had actually killed Mercutio, so Romeo should not be blamed. Mercutio’s is however, a really little bit to blame, for his own death, which made Romeo eliminate Tybalt, and then get Banished for that criminal activity.

Mercutio wasn’t going searching for a battle, However he wasn’t looking not to eliminate either. When Tybalt, comes and wishes to combat, so Mercutio reacts by challenging him to a battle too. Mercutio states, “Here’s my fiddlestick, here’s that shall make you dance. “(3. 1. 41,42) We also learn that he is very proud. “Guys’s eyes were made to look, and let them look; I will not budge for no man’s pleasure, I. “(3. 1. 47,48) From these passages, from the book, I have actually chosen that Mercutio played the function of the retaliator.

Therefore his fault is just because of Tybalt’s, so that he needs to just be slightly blamed. Benvolio’s Function in this conflict was nothing but as a passivist/moderator. I came to this conclusion when he states things like “I pray thee, excellent Mercutio, let’s retire: The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, And if we fulfill we will not leave a brawl” And “We talk here in the general public haunt of males: Either withdraw unto some private place, or Factor coldly of your grievances, Or else depart; here all eyes look on us. “(3. 1. 43-46) By these speeches he is always trying to prevent or delay the fight.

In this case Benvolio is not to blame at all, however rather must be commended for his efforts for peace. Friar Lawerence is to be blamed likewise, for he had excellent idea’s of peace after he married Juliet to Romeo. He verified the marriage of these 2 people, since of his concepts, and he didn’t do the ideal thing, which would be to inform the parents, and make them see that Romeo and Juliet were truly in love. And to let the moms and dads choose what would be best. He messed that up, and after that he messed up some more, when he helped Juliet to deceive her moms and dads, by faking her death.

He continues to mess up to secure his original mistake of weding Romeo and Juliet. Juliet’s Moms and dads also contributed by requiring her to marry Paris, and this required her to fake her death, to get out of her marriage, and to get to Romeo. They were unaware of her previous marital relationship, so it is not actually their fault. After identifying this, there is still some confusion over the fault of some people, so that we need to look upon another aspect, which may make things a little clearer. That factor is fate. Before identifying what function fate played we must initially identify the meaning of fate.

Fate comes from the Ancient Greek Folklores, when there were three female goddesses, who were thought to spin a thread that was your life, and they would shake it, to shake up your life. It was likewise thought that the Fates supervised of when you passed away and when you did pass away, they cut the thread. To make that more clear, Fate, is when something takes place or is going to occur, and you have no control over it. It tells us right in the beginning that Romeo and Juliet’s love is fated “A set of star-crossed enthusiasts take their life. I don’t truly believe in fate, however in this fictional tragedy, fate was an exceptional choice to explain some of the important things that took place. In conclusion this exciting tragic love, has actually used a complex web, in the responsibility for the catastrophe, so that no one can be held entirely responsible, and no one is left without a part in disaster. The way that Shakespeare makes an individual play more than among the fundamental functions, throughout the conflict, is a sensational way to stimulate interest, since people are confused by an abrupt change of attitude or character. This process leaves the audience, attempting to comprehend, so they become fascinated.