Views on Baz Luhrman’s Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet

Capulet my name is anonymous. My subject for the IOP is based on the film ‘Romeo and Juliet by B Luhrmann. I am going to impersonate William Shakespeare with a monologue where I shall speak aloud my views on Baz Luhrman’s adjustment of my text.

When I wrote this book I was drawing in a crowd with extremely orthodoxed thnking. the concept of 2 young fans breaking the society simply for lust was intolerable! for this reason in my book they died 4 days into their courtship. Death was their penalty for going against the knomes of the society. my book was a one with a serious message put forth to the reader.

Where as the motion picture which was adapted frm my text seems to be moulded inorder to bring in an audience with a really openmindset mindset who choose home entertainment over moral values. It had a many humourous scenes, mercutio dressing up like a girl and dancing at the capulets party, which the modern-day crowd would enjoy more. The main objective of the this motion picture was to generate income, which was done by buffooning at my well known novel of romeo and Juliet. adjusting their motion picture from my book must have been a substantial advantage for them as tthey wouldn’t have needed any script or a brand-new story which has the danger of being disliked by the audience. hey just changed the costumes and scenarios into contemporary ones which will obviously amuse the audience as they envision romeo as a young teenager in the days of old and not wearing a match and smoking cigarettes a cigarette on the beach. the movie has a numerous differnces compared to the book in order to make the film more amusing. in my book Juliet was 14 years of ages however in the film Juliet does not seem 14 at all. the motion picture makers changed this aspect of the book in their motion picture in order to make the scenes expressing desire more amusing for the crowd.

However the factor I had Juliet to be so young in the book was to highlight reality that her actions were all justified by the reality that she was immature. The costumes of the actors in the movie were very western and commonly used by the people of the new times. in my book they were indicated to be dress the method the people did during the time of the book being released. rather of using the olden day clothing characters like benvolio were using hawaian t-shirts and romeo was worn a fit cigarette smoking a cigarette on the beach. scenes like this weren’t typical to see in days when I wrote the book.

Rather of actually swords the charactes threatened each other with shinning pistols with the word “sword” sculpted on them. this element of the film killed the seriousness as in the opening scene the capulets pointed a pistol at the montagues and purchased him to raise his “sword”. How will two individuals have a remarkable fight holding two handguns against each other? In my book this scene was expected to be a significant battle. The royal prince was changed by an authorities to make the film more relative to the modern-day world.

The reason my book had a royal prince was to highlight he truth that these two fans were going against the will of the highest authority. the film portrayed the same scenario but the cops official replacing the prince is another example which I saw where barz luhrman has provided a modification in the movie for it to be looking like a contemporary life circumstance. In 2 offices of the capulets and the montagues were displayed in the film as high skyscrapers where as my book was geographically set in Verona which is expected to be a little and silent town. Throughout the time when I wrote this book, writers and producers would only produce works which offered some tips to make the viewers or readers to ponder over particular real life circumstances. however I guess times have changed therefore has the mindset and the taste of the audience. they seem to delight in mockeries instead of eye openers I feel barz luhrman has actually not been loyal to my text while depicting it as a mmovie since the motion picture merely buffoons at the text if I had an option to develop a film depicting my text it would have been really different not altering any scenes for it to be taken pleasure in by the modern crowd.